Pine Bluff To Madison '76 (FTD) Version 2

Alternate cover art done by fans

Moderators: FECC-Moderator, Moderator5, Moderator3, Site Mechanic


Topic author
dicke.katze
Posts: 81
Registered for: 5 years 7 months
Location: In the heart of Germany
Been thanked: 69 times

Pine Bluff To Madison '76 (FTD) Version 2

Post by dicke.katze »

Hey all,

I wasn't too satisfied with the modern approach I uploaded some days ago.

So that's the new idea.

Which do you like better ? :D

TCB,
Thomas
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


User avatar

xmascarrol
Posts: 1007
Registered for: 11 years 10 months
Location: anywhere ELVIS IS PLAYING.
Mood:
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 150 times
Age: 51

Re: Pine Bluff To Madison '76 (FTD) Version 2

Post by xmascarrol »

Can I be honest, I prefer the first version but very good try.


he maybe gone but never forgotten.

Topic author
dicke.katze
Posts: 81
Registered for: 5 years 7 months
Location: In the heart of Germany
Been thanked: 69 times

Re: Pine Bluff To Madison '76 (FTD) Version 2

Post by dicke.katze »

:D ..... as it was often with Camden releases


User avatar

LSP-4445
Posts: 3201
Registered for: 9 years 4 months
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 998 times

Re: Pine Bluff To Madison '76 (FTD) Version 2

Post by LSP-4445 »

The back cover you posted earlier was good but didnt like the front due to how `Elvis` was designed.
These however is bad ….imo…front cover has parts stolen from awful Camden releases and the back is just poor.
And why write Camden on the front, that just dont make any sense…..


.
.
Image
.
.
Image

Topic author
dicke.katze
Posts: 81
Registered for: 5 years 7 months
Location: In the heart of Germany
Been thanked: 69 times

Re: Pine Bluff To Madison '76 (FTD) Version 2

Post by dicke.katze »

LSP-4445 wrote:
Sat May 21, 2022 12:42 am
The back cover you posted earlier was good but didnt like the front due to how `Elvis` was designed.
These however is bad ….imo…front cover has parts stolen from awful Camden releases and the back is just poor.
And why write Camden on the front, that just dont make any sense…..
That was the basic idea: Since these concerts weren't recorded professionally giving them the "Camden-touch". Like releasing all that's in the can on at least the Camden-Label (c.f. Parker's philosophy) ... that's why the original logo appears on the front and a Camden lookalike back was chosen ....

But luckily you like the second version better :D