The back cover you posted earlier was good but didnt like the front due to how `Elvis` was designed.
These however is bad ….imo…front cover has parts stolen from awful Camden releases and the back is just poor.
And why write Camden on the front, that just dont make any sense…..
The back cover you posted earlier was good but didnt like the front due to how `Elvis` was designed.
These however is bad ….imo…front cover has parts stolen from awful Camden releases and the back is just poor.
And why write Camden on the front, that just dont make any sense…..
That was the basic idea: Since these concerts weren't recorded professionally giving them the "Camden-touch". Like releasing all that's in the can on at least the Camden-Label (c.f. Parker's philosophy) ... that's why the original logo appears on the front and a Camden lookalike back was chosen ....