
That's all.
P.S. Black: Did you ever hear of the saying "flogging a dead horse?".
Moderators: FECC-Moderator, Moderator5, Moderator3, drjohncarpenter, Site Mechanic
It's quite obvious some of our other major posters on this forum haven't heard that saying!walter hale wrote:Did you ever hear of the saying "flogging a dead horse?".
Sorry but that quote from Sam Phillips talking about the mid-fifties is no evidence that Clyde was at the party in 1970. No one here has said that Elvis wasn't a fan of Clyde's voice or didn't know who he was. The only disagreement is if that is or isn't Clyde seen in that clip telling Elvis 'You did all my moves'.drjohncarpenter wrote:To those who trusted the doc -- like Ernst Jorgensen -- give yourself a pat on the back.tcb4 wrote:And SUN Studios founder and producer Sam Phillips weighs in ->
You remember Clyde McPhatter?
Elvis thought Clyde McPhatter had one of the greatest voices in the world.
We were going somewhere one time - down to the Louisiana Hayride or to Nashville - and we were singing in the car. Well, Bill Black couldn't carry a tune in a bucket, and Scotty was worse. So Elvis and I were the only good singers in the car.
But we were talking about Clyde McPhatter, and he said, "You know, if I had a voice like that man, I'd never want for another thing."
http://www.elvis.com.au/presley/a_broken_heart.shtml
PEP and tcb4 -- I appreciate your work underscoring what I first posted on June 20, 2008.
Not for some, evidently.The Purple Gang wrote: [it's too early to dismiss what Chris Black has brought to the debate.
I have !walter hale wrote:Did you ever hear of the saying "flogging a dead horse?".
You're in Las Vegas for some unspecified purpose.walter hale wrote:Hey PEP :![]()
My friend I hear what you say but by the same token, to reiterate Marty Lacker's statement: "Sometimes husbands don't tell wives what they did, especially in Vegas", is also rather significant.
Suppose Clyde was also in Vegas for another purpose? Then It would be most sad and hurtful for his widow if that came to light. My friend, Marty's statement is good enough for me and skeptics such as Black should leave it alone.
Oh, there's a very quick shot of him sitting at a table with a sign on it saying 'reserved for Clyde McPhatter' , but you'll miss it if you blink...............................speedoo wrote:Does he show up anywhere else on the TTWII movie? In the audience, in the background somewhere else? Anyone checked?
Nah, couldn't be. His wife might have spotted it and 38 years later all hell could have broke loose.ColinB wrote:Oh, there's a very quick shot of him sitting at a table with a sign on it saying 'reserved for Clyde McPhatter' , but you'll miss it if you blink...............................speedoo wrote:Does he show up anywhere else on the TTWII movie? In the audience, in the background somewhere else? Anyone checked?
That's the conflict.ColinB wrote:all the while people who were there are saying something quite at odds with what Clyde's own widow is saying
I'm not sure.Jumpsuit Junkie wrote:Agreed Scott. I think maybe if she says its not Clyde then I would think it isn't.Scott wrote:That's the conflict.ColinB wrote:all the while people who were there are saying something quite at odds with what Clyde's own widow is saying
Widow saying it's not her husband in the pic; people who were there saying it was.
Assuming the info Chris has provided is authentic, how could a woman not recognise her own husband in what is rather a clear picture?
Well, we only have Chris's word on this.BIGREDG wrote:I am sure Chris B will have emailed the photo.
This being the case, it would seem unlikely that she is wrong IMO.
Still an interesting "detective" like thread !!
Well Chris said "I've spoken to Clyde McPhatter's widow, Lee Rackley, and she's looked at the screen grab I sent her"BIGREDG wrote:I am sure Chris B will have emailed the photo.
This being the case, it would seem unlikely that she is wrong IMO.
Still an interesting "detective" like thread !!
So, presumably, the lady herself is not online. Personally, I wouldn't encourage her to subject herself to open questioning on an Elvis website. I think this goes for any 'witness'. It's fairer if there's an intermediary acting on their behalf. As we know, things can sometimes get a little lively here in the heat of the moment.Chris Black wrote: I didn't get an e-mail from Lee, I spoke to her on the phone after I sent the screen grab to her daughter.
ColinB wrote:Has she seen the photo and said 'that's not Clyde'.
You're right of course. I guess it's going to be hard to resolve this unless we get someone in the know to corroborate it one way or the other. An email from the daughter would have been good, but some may say that could have been fixed.The Purple Gang wrote:Hi Speedoo. I don't think there's any mystery:So, presumably, the lady herself is not online. Personally, I wouldn't encourage her to subject herself to open questioning on an Elvis website. I think this goes for any 'witness'. It's fairer if there's an intermediary acting on their behalf. As we know, things can sometimes get a little lively here in the heat of the moment.Chris Black wrote: I didn't get an e-mail from Lee, I spoke to her on the phone after I sent the screen grab to her daughter.![]()
The lead horses are long gone...................Speedoo wrote:We need it from the horses mouth but the horses ain't talking.
Certainly one of them has. We don't yet know who the other horse is, or do we?ColinB wrote:The lead horses are long gone...................Speedoo wrote:We need it from the horses mouth but the horses ain't talking.
Unfortunately, the image you took along to Memphis (1) was much too busy for anyone to make a qualified judgement, and (2) wrongly identified some of the shots as McPhatter, when they were other party guests.PEP wrote:Sorry Doc, thing's aren't looking too promising that the person in question, is McPhatter.