Elvis Presley - Master & Sessions 1953 - 1955

[Matt Ashton]

Pure heaven listening to this in great quality on a record (or vinyl for the new kids).
Blue moon is chilling.
.

WhatsApp Image 2024-03-30 at 14.18.55_1a54dd17.jpg

171.jpg

[drjohncarpenter]

Shady, overseas grey market labels can only take you so far.

[Flavor24]

They take me back to 1954.

[Matt Ashton]

Shady, overseas grey market labels can only take you so far.

I'm assuming that you don't have a copy? Otherwise the inaccurate assessment of the quality of this Item makes your comments look foolish!

[drjohncarpenter]

Shady, overseas grey market labels can only take you so far.

I'm assuming that you don't have a copy? Otherwise the inaccurate assessment of the quality of this Item makes your comments look foolish!

"inaccurate assessment"



Actually, no.

That label repurposes audio from official sources, amateurs using computer software.

That is a fact, and a disqualifier. That is the basis of my comment.

I know how much work went into the official release of this material, what primary sources were found and utilized, and which professional engineers spent hundreds of hours to make the best possible representation of the original recordings.

[drjohncarpenter]

Since you chose to attack my comment, I will also note the lies seen on the grey market's website about this product:

All tracks have been remastered and restored to its original sound using sophisticated technology. Included - for the first time since 1954 - the 45rpm Sun release of 'That's All Right' in its original 'dry' form.

The official release of the original "dry" Sun 209 A-side was by FTD in 2012.

The "restored to its original sound using sophisticated technology" is another way of saying an amateur repurposed the official audio using computer software.

No, thank you.

[Matt Ashton]

So as I pointed out, you don't have a copy of this vinyl? so you assume that it is poor quality based on what? Assumptions? Do you have to piss on every bonfire?

[drjohncarpenter]

So as I pointed out, you don't have a copy of this vinyl? so you assume that it is poor quality based on what? Assumptions? Do you have to piss on every bonfire?

I have been civil towards you in this topic. You have been otherwise.