My comment was her comment that she said in the interview, which she realized that Elvis was normal after meeting him (especially after the fame). I trust her opinion after reading her stories and I appreciate all the answers that she has given for the people on the message board. It's not that hard to figure that out after I cut and paste that partial statement from her interview. In other words, you disagree with my comment and hers (smh). All I wanted to do was to acknowledged what I learn from her and thank her for her time. I didn't ask for a Disagreeing Danny, Argumentative Andrew, or a Complicated Charliedrjohncarpenter wrote:That's two questions. And I disagreed with your comment.
What did I interpret? That you have an inaccurate view of Elvis as "normal." Why do I disagree? Because he was not, especially after the fame hit.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
It may have been two questions but it was an open and closed question to get a conversation going between us. From the term in my philosophy book, you lack explanatory power. As an FECC friend/Elvis Collector colleague, you still didn't explain why he wasn't normal. Just saying "he was not" & "after the fame hit" don't quite sums it all up for me buddy.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)